No graduate of a Top Tier Law school should ever sit on the Supreme Court. They got there by studying 80 hours a week, from Kindergarten to Law School graduation. They don't know anything. They are book worms.
Given this attack, should Kavanaugh recuse himself from any future case or controversy involving a feminist question? Would his vote always be retaliatory for the unfair treatment he has endured? Or, will he have to rule in their favor to show no retaliatory intent? The intent of this false allegation is to nominate only females in the future. Every heterosexual male has engaged in sexual misconduct. Testosterone drives sexual interest. Male testosterone produced by testicles is 8 times higher than female testosterone produced by their adrenal glands. There will always be a mismatch in level of interest, and in speed of interest. This is an involuntary biological feature. The nitpicking of sexual misconduct violates the Civil Rights Act, if not the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The feminists are trying to delay his confirmation using false allegations. All allegations by feminists are false. They require extraordinary proof to even be considered at all. I once discussed my experience. I suggested females avoid high risk situations to lower the number of rapes. For example, leave the vicinity of intoxicated males. Dozens of feminists, I had never met, called me a pedophile, a serial rapist, a serial killer, an animal abuser. None of those allegations were true.
First of all, look at this horse looking feminist skank. Even drunk to an extreme, who would want to jump her bones? Hers is a ridiculous claim on its "face." Second, she is a paid operative of a Soros funded Democratic Party attack group. The federal government should send Soros the bill for all investigations and legal costs caused by their agent.
https://www.worldtribune.com/who-is-christine-blasey-ford-part-ii-the-soros-connection/
No comments:
Post a Comment