Saturday, July 11, 2026

Proposal: Establish a National Acute Home Stabilization Standard for Suicide Prevention. Eyesight Supervision


The United States should adopt a national suicide-prevention policy that focuses on where much of the danger actually occurs: the home. In 2022, about 49,000 people died by suicide in the United States. The most common location was a house or apartment, at 71.5% of cases. More than half of suicides involved a firearm, and alcohol was common among those tested: 40.1% were alcohol-positive, and among those positives, 64.1% had a blood alcohol concentration at or above 0.08 g/dL. A national policy that does not directly address acute home crises, lethal means, and intoxication is missing a large part of the problem.

Current federal policy provides a strong framework, but it does not yet give families and front-line responders a simple national rule for the first dangerous hours of a home crisis. The 2024 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention is a whole-of-society plan. Its Federal Action Plan calls for suicide care pathways, 988 and mobile-crisis coordination, and stronger evaluation of prevention efforts. SAMHSA’s 2025 crisis-care guidelines also say crisis services should be person-centered, family-focused, and provide the right level of care at the right time.

This proposal would add one missing operational standard: when a person is at acute suicide risk and appears intoxicated or otherwise acutely destabilized, federally supported crisis systems should activate a short-term home protocol built around continuous awake, in-person supervision—what I would call home “eyesight supervision”—when home management is clinically appropriate and can be made safe. This is not a substitute for emergency care. It is a time-buying intervention for an acute window when the person should not be left alone. NIMH’s clinical guidance already states that a person with current suicidal thoughts cannot be left alone, and NIMH’s public guidance tells helpers to be there, help keep the person safe, connect them to 988, and follow up.

The corrections system offers a useful but limited lesson. DOJ guidance found that many jail suicides clustered in the first hours after intake, and Bureau of Justice Statistics data show that local jail suicide rates fell from 129 per 100,000 inmates in 1983 to 47 in 2002. That does not prove that homes are the same as jails, but it does show that early identification, close observation, and safer environments can matter during acute-risk windows. At the same time, a VA systematic review found no direct studies showing that one-to-one sitters alone reduce suicide or self-harm, so a responsible national policy should treat home eyesight supervision as one part of a broader package and should pilot it before scaling it.

Under this proposal, HHS and SAMHSA should issue a National Acute Home Stabilization Protocol for use by 988 centers, mobile crisis teams, emergency departments, certified community behavioral health clinics, VA facilities, primary care practices, and hospital discharge planners. The protocol should apply when a person is suicidal or recently suicidal, appears intoxicated or rapidly worsening, and can remain at home only if a responsible adult is physically present and the environment can be secured. If the person is medically unstable, violent, cannot be safely supervised, or has immediate intent that cannot be contained, the protocol should require escalation to emergency evaluation rather than home management. This proposal fits naturally inside the federal crisis-care structure already being built around care pathways, 988, and mobile crisis.

The protocol should have five required elements. First, continuous awake in-person presence for a defined acute period, such as until sobriety or formal clinical reassessment. Second, immediate lethal-means safety, including temporary off-site storage or secure locking of firearms, medications, and other dangerous items; VA guidance already emphasizes secure household storage options. Third, a warm handoff to 988, which SAMHSA describes as 24/7 support for mental health, substance use, and suicidal crisis. Fourth, rapid access to mobile crisis or urgent telehealth evaluation when risk remains elevated. Fifth, mandatory follow-up within 24 hours and again within 7 days, because ongoing contact matters and multicomponent follow-up models such as ED-SAFE have reduced later suicidal behaviors.

To make this real national policy rather than guidance on paper, Congress should direct HHS to launch a five-year multi-state demonstration under the 2024 National Strategy and Federal Action Plan. SAMHSA should write the operational guidance. NIH and CDC should evaluate outcomes. CMS should create reimbursement pathways for crisis safety planning, caregiver coaching, mobile crisis response, and follow-up contacts. States should be allowed to use demonstration funds for lockboxes, medication lock bags, transportation, and temporary caregiver support. Goal 15 of the National Strategy already calls for improved data, research, and evaluation, and the Federal Action Plan already contemplates evidence-based interventions, care pathways, and more prompt access to mobile crisis teams.

The demonstration should be judged by hard outcomes, not good intentions. Metrics should include suicide attempts, suicide deaths, emergency-department revisits, use of 988 and mobile crisis, successful lethal-means securing, follow-up completion, caregiver burden, rural access, racial equity, and rates of coercive emergency intervention. The policy should also test the question the current literature has not yet answered directly: whether home eyesight supervision adds benefit beyond safety planning, means safety, and follow-up alone. That is why pilot testing is essential. The strongest current evidence is for multicomponent care, not for supervision by itself.

In plain terms, the national policy change should be this: when suicide risk is acute and the crisis is unfolding at home—especially when intoxication is part of the picture—the United States should not rely on advice alone. It should activate a standard, family-focused, evidence-tested home stabilization response: be there, secure the environment, connect the person to 988 and crisis care, and follow up. That is more defensible than a stand-alone “watch them” mandate, more consistent with current federal strategy, and more likely to save lives if it is piloted, measured, and improved. 

Comprehensive numbered list of law subjects

Foundations, legal systems, theory, history, and method

  1. Jurisprudence
  2. General legal theory
  3. Philosophy of law
  4. Natural-law theory
  5. Legal positivism
  6. Legal realism
  7. Analytical jurisprudence
  8. Normative jurisprudence
  9. Sociological jurisprudence
  10. Historical jurisprudence
  11. Critical legal studies
  12. Legal interpretation and hermeneutics
  13. Statutory interpretation
  14. Constitutional interpretation
  15. Legal reasoning and legal method
  16. Legal history
  17. Comparative legal history
  18. Roman law
  19. Comparative law
  20. Conflict of laws / private international law
  21. Transnational law
  22. Legal pluralism
  23. Customary law
  24. Common-law studies
  25. Civil-law studies
  26. Mixed legal systems
  27. Socialist legal systems
  28. Law reform
  29. Rule-of-law studies
  30. Codification
  31. Empirical legal studies
  32. Legal research methodology

Private law, obligations, torts, and remedies

  1. Private law
  2. Law of obligations
  3. Contract law
  4. Commercial-contract law
  5. Consumer-contract law
  6. Consumer-protection law
  7. International-contract law
  8. Tort law
  9. Personal-injury law
  10. Product-liability law
  11. Product-safety law
  12. Professional-negligence and malpractice law
  13. Defamation law
  14. Privacy torts
  15. Economic torts
  16. Nuisance law
  17. Compensation-systems law
  18. Equity
  19. Remedies
  20. Restitution
  21. Unjust enrichment
  22. Fiduciary law
  23. Agency law

Property, land, housing, trusts, and succession

  1. Property law
  2. Real-property and land law
  3. Personal-property law
  4. Real-estate-transactions law
  5. Commercial-leasing law
  6. Real-estate-finance law
  7. Conveyancing
  8. Land-registration law
  9. Landlord-and-tenant law
  10. Housing law
  11. Fair-housing law
  12. Homelessness law
  13. Mortgage law
  14. Foreclosure law
  15. Land-use law
  16. Zoning law
  17. Planning law
  18. Urban law
  19. Rural law
  20. Eminent-domain and compulsory-acquisition law
  21. Expropriation law
  22. Common-interest-community and condominium law
  23. Construction law
  24. Historic-preservation law
  25. Water-rights law
  26. Public-lands law
  27. Indigenous land-rights law
  28. Property theory
  29. Trusts law
  30. Estates law
  31. Wills law
  32. Succession and inheritance law
  33. Estate-planning law
  34. Probate law

Family, children, reproduction, capacity, and personal status

  1. Family law
  2. Marriage law
  3. Divorce law
  4. Matrimonial-property law
  5. Child-custody and child-support law
  6. Parent-and-child law
  7. Children’s-rights law
  8. Child-welfare and child-protection law
  9. Adoption law
  10. Assisted-reproduction law
  11. Surrogacy law
  12. Reproductive-rights law
  13. Domestic-violence law
  14. Juvenile law
  15. Guardianship law
  16. Capacity law
  17. Elder law
  18. Personal-status law
  19. Gender-identity and legal-status law

Business organizations, commerce, finance, insolvency, and markets

  1. Business-associations law
  2. Corporate and company law
  3. Corporate-governance law
  4. Corporate-compliance law
  5. Corporate-social-responsibility law
  6. Corporate-finance law
  7. Mergers-and-acquisitions law
  8. Securities law
  9. Capital-markets law
  10. Partnership law
  11. Limited-liability-company law
  12. Unincorporated-associations law
  13. Cooperative law
  14. Nonprofit-organizations law
  15. Charity and philanthropy law
  16. Social-enterprise law
  17. Entrepreneurship and startup law
  18. Venture-capital law
  19. Private-equity law
  20. Business-planning law
  21. Transactional law
  22. Commercial law
  23. Sales law
  24. Secured-transactions law
  25. Commercial-paper law
  26. Negotiable-instruments law
  27. Payment-systems law
  28. Banking law
  29. Financial-regulation law
  30. Regulatory-compliance and financial-compliance law
  31. Financial-institutions law
  32. Central-banking and monetary law
  33. Consumer-credit law
  34. Bankruptcy law
  35. Insolvency law
  36. Corporate-restructuring law
  37. Creditors’ rights
  38. Debtors’ rights
  39. Insurance law
  40. Reinsurance law
  41. Antitrust and competition law
  42. Trade-regulation law
  43. Unfair-competition law
  44. Commodities, futures, and derivatives law
  45. Accounting law
  46. Auditing law
  47. Franchise law
  48. Distribution and dealership law
  49. Advertising and marketing law
  50. Electronic-commerce law
  51. Financial-technology law
  52. Digital-assets and cryptocurrency law
  53. Blockchain and Web3 law
  54. Islamic-finance law
  55. Project-finance law
  56. Sustainable-finance and ESG law
  57. Public-finance law
  58. Municipal-finance law
  59. International-business-transactions law
  60. International-commercial law

Taxation

  1. Tax law
  2. Individual-income-tax law
  3. Corporate-tax law
  4. Partnership-tax law
  5. International-tax law
  6. Transfer-pricing law
  7. Value-added-tax and goods-and-services-tax law
  8. Sales-and-use-tax law
  9. State-and-local-tax law
  10. Estate-and-gift-tax law
  11. Payroll-tax law
  12. Customs-and-excise law
  13. Nonprofit-tax law
  14. Employee-benefits taxation
  15. Tax procedure
  16. Tax controversy and tax litigation
  17. Tax policy
  18. Tax-avoidance and anti-abuse law
  19. Tax-crime law

Labor, employment, benefits, and social welfare

  1. Labor law
  2. Employment law
  3. Labor-relations law
  4. Collective-bargaining law
  5. Trade-union law
  6. Employment-discrimination law
  7. Wage-and-hour law
  8. Occupational-safety-and-health law
  9. Workers’ compensation law
  10. Employee-benefits law
  11. Pension law
  12. Executive-compensation law
  13. Public-sector labor law
  14. Workplace-privacy law
  15. Restrictive-covenant and noncompete law
  16. Whistleblower law
  17. Migrant-worker and farmworker law
  18. Unemployment-insurance law
  19. Social-security law
  20. Social-insurance law
  21. Welfare and public-benefits law
  22. Poverty law
  23. Economic-justice law
  24. Community-economic-development law

Constitutional, administrative, governmental, and political-process law

  1. Constitutional law
  2. Public law
  3. Constitutional theory
  4. Comparative constitutional law
  5. State constitutional law
  6. Administrative law
  7. Administrative-procedure law
  8. Administrative-enforcement law
  9. Regulatory law
  10. Judicial-review law
  11. Separation-of-powers law
  12. Federalism law
  13. Parliamentary law
  14. Executive-power and presidential law
  15. Legislation
  16. Legislative-process law
  17. Election law
  18. Voting-rights law
  19. Campaign-finance law
  20. Political-parties law
  21. Lobbying law
  22. Democracy and political-process law
  23. State-and-local-government law
  24. Municipal law
  25. Federal-courts law
  26. Courts and jurisdiction
  27. Judicial-administration law
  28. Court-administration law
  29. Public-procurement law
  30. Government-contracts law
  31. Public-employment and civil-service law
  32. Government-ethics law
  33. Government-accountability law
  34. Freedom-of-information law
  35. Public-records and open-government law
  36. Ombudsman and administrative-justice law
  37. Public-utilities law
  38. Regulated-industries law
  39. Emergency-powers law
  40. Disaster law
  41. National-security law
  42. Military law
  43. Veterans law
  44. Intelligence law
  45. Counterterrorism law
  46. Foreign-relations law
  47. Firearms law

Migration, nationality, and borders

  1. Immigration law
  2. Nationality and citizenship law
  3. Asylum law
  4. Refugee law
  5. Statelessness law
  6. Border law
  7. Deportation and removal law
  8. Migration law

Civil rights, civil liberties, equality, and access to justice

  1. Civil-rights law
  2. Civil-liberties law
  3. Human-rights law
  4. Antidiscrimination law
  5. Equality law
  6. Race and the law
  7. Gender and the law
  8. Women and the law
  9. Sexual-orientation and gender-identity law
  10. Disability law
  11. Mental-disability law
  12. Age-discrimination law
  13. Religious-liberty law
  14. Church-and-state law
  15. Freedom-of-speech law
  16. Freedom-of-the-press law
  17. Freedom-of-assembly and protest law
  18. Privacy law
  19. Prisoners’ rights law
  20. Minority-rights law
  21. Indigenous-peoples’ rights law
  22. Socioeconomic-rights law
  23. Public-interest law
  24. Legal-aid law
  25. Pro bono and access-to-justice law
  26. Constitutional-remedies law

Criminal law, criminal justice, and enforcement

  1. Substantive criminal law
  2. Criminal procedure
  3. Constitutional criminal procedure
  4. Criminology
  5. Criminal-justice law
  6. Policing and law-enforcement law
  7. Prosecution law
  8. Public-defense and indigent-defense law
  9. Bail and pretrial-detention law
  10. Sentencing law
  11. Corrections and prison law
  12. Probation, parole, and clemency law
  13. Juvenile-justice law
  14. Capital-punishment law
  15. Post-conviction and habeas-corpus law
  16. Victims’ rights law
  17. Restorative-justice law
  18. White-collar-crime law
  19. Corporate-crime law
  20. Financial-crime law
  21. Fraud law
  22. Anti-corruption and bribery law
  23. Money-laundering law
  24. Organized-crime law
  25. Human-trafficking law
  26. Transnational-crime law
  27. Extradition and mutual-legal-assistance law
  28. Terrorism-offenses law
  29. Hate-crime law
  30. Drug and controlled-substances law
  31. Cannabis law
  32. Cybercrime law
  33. Sexual-offenses law
  34. Traffic and motor-vehicle offenses law
  35. Treason, sedition, and espionage law
  36. Military-criminal law
  37. Forensic-science law
  38. Criminal-justice-reform law
  39. Abolitionist legal studies

Procedure, litigation, evidence, and dispute resolution

  1. Civil procedure
  2. Civil litigation
  3. Appellate procedure and practice
  4. Trial practice and advocacy
  5. Class-action law
  6. Complex-litigation law
  7. Multidistrict-litigation law
  8. Mass-tort litigation
  9. Constitutional litigation
  10. Public-interest litigation
  11. Transnational litigation
  12. International litigation
  13. Administrative adjudication
  14. Evidence law
  15. Digital-evidence law
  16. Expert-evidence law
  17. Electronic-discovery law
  18. Enforcement of judgments
  19. Recognition of foreign judgments
  20. Arbitration law
  21. Alternative dispute resolution
  22. International-commercial-arbitration law
  23. Investor–state arbitration law
  24. Mediation law
  25. Negotiation law
  26. Conciliation law
  27. Collaborative law
  28. Online-dispute-resolution law

Public international law, armed conflict, and global governance

  1. Public international law
  2. Sources of international law
  3. Treaty law
  4. Law of international organizations
  5. United Nations law
  6. International peace-and-security law
  7. Diplomatic and consular law
  8. Statehood and recognition law
  9. Territory and international-boundaries law
  10. State-responsibility law
  11. International jurisdiction and immunities law
  12. International-dispute-settlement law
  13. International-courts-and-tribunals law
  14. International human-rights law
  15. International humanitarian law / law of armed conflict / law of war
  16. Law on the use of force (jus ad bellum)
  17. International criminal law
  18. International criminal procedure
  19. War-crimes law
  20. Genocide law
  21. Crimes-against-humanity law
  22. Crime-of-aggression law
  23. Transitional-justice law
  24. Peacekeeping law
  25. Law of military occupation
  26. Law of neutrality
  27. Weapons law
  28. Arms-control and disarmament law
  29. Nuclear-nonproliferation law
  30. Economic-sanctions law
  31. Export-controls law
  32. International economic law
  33. International trade law
  34. World Trade Organization law
  35. International investment law
  36. International financial law
  37. International monetary law
  38. International development law
  39. Sustainable-development law
  40. International environmental law
  41. International climate law
  42. Law of the sea
  43. Maritime-boundary law
  44. International-fisheries law
  45. International aviation law
  46. Outer-space law
  47. International telecommunications law
  48. International intellectual-property law
  49. International labor law
  50. International health law
  51. International refugee law
  52. International migration law
  53. International family law
  54. International humanitarian-assistance law
  55. International disaster-response law
  56. Business-and-human-rights law
  57. International anti-corruption law
  58. International cyber law
  59. International watercourses law
  60. Polar and Antarctic law
  61. Cultural-property law in armed conflict

Regional, supranational, religious, and Indigenous legal systems

  1. European Union law
  2. European human-rights law
  3. Council of Europe law
  4. Inter-American law
  5. Inter-American human-rights law
  6. African Union law
  7. African regional law
  8. East Asian law
  9. South Asian law
  10. Middle Eastern law
  11. Latin American law
  12. Caribbean law
  13. Pacific law
  14. ASEAN law
  15. Religious law
  16. Canon and ecclesiastical law
  17. Islamic law—Sharia
  18. Jewish law—Halakha
  19. Hindu law
  20. Indigenous and tribal law
  21. Native American law
  22. African customary law

Environment, climate, natural resources, energy, agriculture, and animals

  1. Environmental law
  2. Environmental-compliance and enforcement law
  3. Climate-change law
  4. Environmental-justice law
  5. Natural-resources law
  6. Energy law
  7. Oil-and-gas law
  8. Mining law
  9. Forestry and timber law
  10. Water law
  11. Ocean and coastal law
  12. Fisheries law
  13. Wildlife law
  14. Animal law
  15. Biodiversity and conservation law
  16. Land-conservation law
  17. Agricultural law
  18. Food law
  19. Air-pollution law
  20. Water-pollution law
  21. Waste-management law
  22. Hazardous-substances law
  23. Toxic-torts law
  24. Environmental-impact-assessment law
  25. Renewable-energy law
  26. Electricity law
  27. Utility-regulation law
  28. Nuclear-energy law
  29. Energy-transition law
  30. Carbon-markets law
  31. Sustainability law

Health, medicine, bioethics, food, and life sciences

  1. Health law
  2. Medical law
  3. Public-health law
  4. Global-health law
  5. Bioethics
  6. Biolaw
  7. Medical-malpractice law
  8. Hospital law
  9. Health-insurance law
  10. Mental-health law
  11. Food-and-drug law
  12. Alcoholic-beverage law
  13. Tobacco and nicotine law
  14. Pharmaceutical law
  15. Biologics law
  16. Medical-device law
  17. Biotechnology law
  18. Life-sciences law
  19. Genetics and genomics law
  20. Reproductive-health law
  21. Human-subjects-research law
  22. Clinical-trials law
  23. Organ-donation and transplantation law
  24. End-of-life law
  25. Health-data and health-privacy law
  26. Digital-health and telemedicine law
  27. Pandemic and health-emergency law
  28. Long-term-care law
  29. Addiction and substance-use law
  30. Forensic-medicine law
  31. Neuroscience and neurolaw

Intellectual property, technology, data, cyber, and communications

  1. Intellectual-property law
  2. Copyright law
  3. Patent law
  4. Trademark law
  5. Trade-secret law
  6. Confidential-information and breach-of-confidence law
  7. Industrial-design law
  8. Geographical-indications law
  9. Plant-variety-protection law
  10. Right-of-publicity law
  11. Moral-rights law
  12. Intellectual-property licensing
  13. Technology-transfer law
  14. Technology-transactions law
  15. Patent-prosecution law
  16. Intellectual-property litigation
  17. Open-source-software law
  18. Software law
  19. Internet and cyberspace law
  20. Artificial-intelligence law
  21. Algorithmic-accountability law
  22. Data-protection law
  23. Cybersecurity law
  24. Telecommunications law
  25. Spectrum law
  26. Communications law
  27. Media law
  28. Broadcasting law
  29. Platform-regulation law
  30. Social-media law
  31. Online-safety law
  32. Information law
  33. Digital-transactions and electronic-signatures law
  34. Surveillance law
  35. Biometrics and facial-recognition law
  36. Robotics law
  37. Autonomous-vehicle law
  38. Drone law
  39. Quantum-technology law
  40. Nanotechnology law
  41. Legal informatics and computational law

Arts, museums, cultural heritage, entertainment, sport, and leisure

  1. Art law
  2. Art-market and auction law
  3. Museum law
  4. Cultural-property law
  5. Cultural-heritage law
  6. Antiquities and repatriation law
  7. Archaeological-heritage law
  8. Fashion law
  9. Entertainment law
  10. Music law
  11. Film-and-television law
  12. Theatre and performing-arts law
  13. Publishing law
  14. Video-game law
  15. Esports law
  16. Sports law
  17. Olympic law
  18. Gambling and gaming law
  19. Hospitality law
  20. Tourism and travel law

Transport, maritime, aviation, infrastructure, and space

  1. Admiralty and maritime law
  2. Shipping law
  3. Carriage-of-goods law
  4. Marine-insurance law
  5. Aviation law
  6. Transportation law
  7. Motor-vehicle law
  8. Railroad law
  9. Public-transit law
  10. Logistics and supply-chain law
  11. Ports and harbors law
  12. Infrastructure law
  13. Commercial-space law
  14. National-security space law

Education and academic institutions

  1. Education law
  2. Primary-and-secondary-education law
  3. Higher-education law
  4. Special-education law
  5. School-finance law
  6. Student-rights law
  7. School-discipline law
  8. Academic-freedom law
  9. Educational-equality law
  10. School-segregation and desegregation law

Legal profession, practice skills, legal education, and institutions

  1. Legal profession law
  2. Professional responsibility
  3. Legal ethics
  4. Judicial ethics
  5. Prosecutorial ethics
  6. Legal-malpractice law
  7. Law-firm and law-practice management
  8. In-house-counsel and corporate-legal-operations law
  9. Legal interviewing and client counseling
  10. Legal research
  11. Legal writing
  12. Advocacy
  13. Legal drafting
  14. Contract drafting
  15. Legislative drafting
  16. Transactional skills
  17. Appellate advocacy
  18. Mooting and moot-court practice
  19. Clinical legal education
  20. Externship and practicum studies
  21. Legal education and pedagogy
  22. Law-school administration
  23. Law libraries and legal information
  24. Law librarianship
  25. Legal technology
  26. Legal design
  27. Alternative-legal-services regulation
  28. Leadership in the legal profession

Interdisciplinary, critical, and sociolegal studies

  1. Law and economics
  2. Law and accounting
  3. Law and finance
  4. Behavioral law and economics
  5. Law and political economy
  6. Law and politics
  7. Law and public policy
  8. Law and philosophy
  9. Law and society
  10. Sociology of law
  11. Law and anthropology
  12. Law and psychology
  13. Law and psychiatry
  14. Law and neuroscience
  15. Law and literature
  16. Law and the humanities
  17. Law and science
  18. Science-and-technology studies and law
  19. Law and geography
  20. Law and religion
  21. Law and development
  22. Law and globalization
  23. Law and culture
  24. Law and language
  25. Socioeconomics
  26. Critical race theory
  27. Feminist legal theory
  28. Queer legal theory
  29. Postcolonial legal theory
  30. Third World approaches to international law—TWAIL
  31. Marxist legal theory
  32. Intersectionality and law
  33. Critical disability legal studies
  34. Law and social movements
  35. Law and social change
  36. Therapeutic jurisprudence

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Why Financial Advisers Should Disclose Their Personal Net Worth to Clients

Financial advisers occupy a position of unusual trust. They ask clients to reveal income, savings, debts, fears, family obligations, retirement dreams, and sometimes every mistake they have ever made with money. In return, advisers recommend how clients should save, invest, insure, borrow, and plan for the future. Yet one key fact is usually hidden from the client: whether the adviser has successfully followed the same financial principles being sold. A reasonable reform would require financial advisers to disclose their personal net worth to clients, privately and confidentially, along with a plain-language explanation of how that net worth was achieved.

This disclosure should not be public. It should not become gossip, punishment, or an invasion of privacy. But it should be available to clients who are being asked to trust the adviser with life savings. The principle is simple: before someone sells financial wisdom, the client should be able to know whether that wisdom has produced durable results in the adviser’s own life.

A surgeon’s skill can be judged by training, outcomes, complication rates, and hospital privileges. A lawyer’s competence can be judged by experience, victories, settlements, and disciplinary history. A financial adviser’s performance is harder to assess. Many advisers are polished speakers. They may have impressive titles, attractive offices, and confident explanations. But none of that proves personal financial competence. A client may reasonably ask: “Have you built wealth yourself, or are you mainly skilled at collecting fees from people who are trying to build wealth?”

Net worth is not a perfect measure of wisdom, but it is relevant. A wealthy adviser is not automatically ethical or competent. A younger adviser may have modest assets despite excellent judgment. Someone may have suffered divorce, illness, disability, family obligations, or other events that reduced wealth through no fault of their own. That is why the disclosure should include not only the number, but also the story: how the adviser got there. Was the wealth built through disciplined saving, long-term investing, business ownership, inheritance, spouse income, real estate speculation, commissions, or selling financial products to clients? These distinctions matter.

For example, an adviser who became wealthy by inheriting money may still be competent, but the client should know that the adviser’s wealth did not primarily come from investment skill. An adviser who became wealthy mainly through high commissions on insurance products should not be able to present that wealth as proof of superior market insight. An adviser who built a modest but steady portfolio over decades through low-cost indexing, tax discipline, and controlled spending may be more credible than a flashy adviser whose own finances are fragile. The disclosure would let clients judge context, not merely credentials.

This reform would also expose conflicts of interest. If an adviser recommends complex private placements, expensive annuities, leveraged real estate, cryptocurrency, whole life insurance, or aggressive tax shelters, the client should know whether the adviser personally uses those strategies and whether they contributed meaningfully to the adviser’s net worth. If the adviser says, “This is the best path for you,” but the adviser’s own wealth came from simple diversified investing, that contrast deserves explanation.

The requirement would encourage humility and honesty. Advisers would have to say, in effect: “Here is my own financial condition. Here is what I did well. Here is what I did poorly. Here is where luck helped me. Here is where discipline helped me. Here is where I would advise you differently than I once acted myself.” That kind of disclosure would deepen trust rather than weaken it. Clients do not need advisers to be perfect. They need them to be candid.

The privacy concern can be solved by limiting disclosure to clients and prospective clients under confidentiality rules. The disclosure could be made in ranges rather than exact dollars, such as: negative net worth, $0–$250,000, $250,000–$1 million, $1–$5 million, $5–$20 million, and over $20 million. Advisers could also disclose whether their net worth came primarily from wages, investment gains, business ownership, inheritance, spouse or family assets, real estate, financial-product commissions, or other sources. Regulators could require annual certification, with penalties for intentional misrepresentation.

This would not be about shaming advisers with low net worth. It would be about informed consent. A 30-year-old adviser with student loans and modest assets may be highly competent, especially if transparent about age, training, and strategy. A 65-year-old adviser with little savings after decades in the industry may still have an explanation, but clients deserve to hear it before trusting that adviser with retirement planning.

Financial advice is not abstract theory. It is practical guidance about how to accumulate, preserve, and use wealth. Clients are required to disclose their financial lives to advisers. Advisers should disclose enough of their own financial lives to show whether their advice is grounded in experience, discipline, and integrity. Private net worth disclosure would not guarantee honesty, but it would make financial advice more transparent, more accountable, and more aligned with the client’s right to know whom they are trusting.

Thursday, May 28, 2026

TREAT for All Act Tele-Mental Health Reimbursement Equity and Access to Treatment for All Act A Model Federal Act to Encourage State Adoption of the TREAT Act and Protect Nationwide Tele-Mental Health Access

 Section 1. Short Title

This Act may be cited as the “TREAT for All Act,” the Tele-Mental Health Reimbursement Equity and Access to Treatment for All Act.


Section 2. Congressional Findings

Congress finds that:

  1. Mental health care is essential health care.
  2. Outpatient mental health care, including psychiatry, mental health therapy, counseling, psychotherapy, behavioral health treatment, substance use disorder counseling, crisis prevention, safety planning, and medication management, is a core component of the Nation’s health care system.
  3. Most outpatient mental health care does not require hands-on physical procedures.
  4. The principal exceptions to telehealth-appropriate outpatient mental health care include electroconvulsive therapy, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, residential treatment requiring physical presence, crisis stabilization requiring physical supervision, physical examination when medically necessary, laboratory testing, toxicology testing, and services that cannot meet the applicable standard of care unless delivered in person.
  5. Requiring in-person attendance as a condition of receiving outpatient mental health care creates barriers for rural patients, disabled patients, working patients, parents, caregivers, students, older adults, patients without reliable transportation, patients with limited broadband access, patients with limited income, and patients whose mental health symptoms make travel difficult.
  6. Unnecessary in-person requirements reduce access to mental health care, delay treatment, increase missed appointments, worsen workforce shortages, and increase the public costs of untreated and undertreated mental health conditions.
  7. Telehealth, including audio-video and audio-only care when clinically appropriate, is an essential access pathway for outpatient mental health care.
  8. Payment reductions for telehealth mental health services discourage providers from offering telehealth, narrow provider networks, and create financial incentives that restrict access to care.
  9. It is in the national interest to encourage every State to make telehealth the default mode of access for outpatient mental health care and to require reimbursement for covered tele-mental health services at rates equal to comparable in-person services.

Section 3. Purpose

The purposes of this Act are to:

  1. encourage all States to enact and enforce a State-level Tele-Mental Health Reimbursement Equity and Access to Treatment Act, known as the TREAT Act;
  2. make telehealth the default access pathway for outpatient mental health care nationwide;
  3. prohibit unnecessary in-person requirements for outpatient mental health care;
  4. protect audio-only telehealth when clinically appropriate or necessary for access;
  5. require payment parity for covered outpatient mental health services delivered by telehealth;
  6. preserve patient choice and individualized clinical judgment;
  7. protect patients and providers from reduced access caused by state inaction; and
  8. condition a portion of covered federal mental health payments on State adoption and enforcement of TREAT-compliant laws.

Section 4. Definitions

For purposes of this Act:

A. “Audio-only telehealth”

“Audio-only telehealth” means the delivery of health care services through real-time, two-way voice communication without video when the treating provider determines that the service can be delivered consistent with the applicable standard of care.

B. “Covered federal mental health payment”

“Covered federal mental health payment” means any federal payment, allotment, grant, cooperative agreement, or federal financial participation paid to or administered by a State for outpatient mental health services, behavioral health services, or substance use disorder services.

The term includes, to the extent permitted by federal law:

  1. Community Mental Health Services Block Grant funds;
  2. federal block grant funds used for outpatient mental health or substance use disorder treatment;
  3. federal grants to a State mental health authority or behavioral health authority for outpatient mental health access;
  4. federal Medicaid payments to a State attributable to outpatient mental health, behavioral health, or substance use disorder services;
  5. federal Children’s Health Insurance Program payments to a State attributable to outpatient mental health, behavioral health, or substance use disorder services;
  6. federal administrative payments to a State for mental health access, behavioral health access, Medicaid mental health administration, or telehealth implementation; and
  7. any other state-administered federal funds designated by the Secretary as covered federal mental health payments.

The term does not include direct payments to Indian Health Service facilities, Tribal health programs, urban Indian organizations, federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, or other non-State entities unless the payment is administered by the State.

C. “Covered outpatient mental health service”

“Covered outpatient mental health service” means any outpatient service, visit, consultation, treatment, procedure, program, or encounter covered under a mental health, behavioral health, or substance use disorder benefit that would be covered if delivered in person.

The term includes, but is not limited to:

  1. psychiatric evaluation;
  2. psychiatric diagnosis;
  3. medication management;
  4. psychotherapy;
  5. mental health therapy;
  6. individual counseling;
  7. family counseling;
  8. group counseling;
  9. behavioral health treatment;
  10. substance use disorder counseling or treatment;
  11. crisis prevention;
  12. safety planning;
  13. care coordination;
  14. case management;
  15. intensive outpatient services;
  16. partial hospitalization services when clinically appropriate for telehealth delivery;
  17. community mental health center services;
  18. federally qualified health center behavioral health services;
  19. rural health clinic behavioral health services;
  20. school-based mental health services; and
  21. any substantially similar outpatient mental health or behavioral health service.

D. “Health plan”

“Health plan” means any insurer, health maintenance organization, nonprofit health service corporation, Medicaid managed care organization, managed care organization, state employee health plan, public employee health benefit plan, or other entity subject to State regulation that provides, administers, or pays for health care coverage.

The term includes third-party administrators and self-funded plans to the maximum extent permitted by federal law.

E. “Secretary”

“Secretary” means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

F. “State”

“State” means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States receiving covered federal mental health payments.

G. “TREAT-compliant law”

“TREAT-compliant law” means a State law, regulation, or enforceable statewide policy that satisfies the minimum requirements described in Section 5 of this Act.


Section 5. Minimum Requirements for State TREAT Compliance

A State shall be considered compliant with this Act only if the State has in effect and enforces a TREAT-compliant law that, at minimum, provides the following protections.

A. Telehealth as Default Access

The State shall make telehealth the default mode of access for covered outpatient mental health services when the service can be delivered by telehealth consistent with the applicable standard of care.

B. Prohibition on In-Person Requirements

The State shall prohibit any provider, health plan, utilization review entity, licensing board, State agency, Medicaid managed care organization, or State-funded program from requiring an in-person visit as a condition of providing, covering, authorizing, renewing, continuing, prescribing for, or reimbursing a covered outpatient mental health service, unless a narrow exception applies.

C. Permitted Exceptions

The State may permit in-person requirements only for:

  1. electroconvulsive therapy;
  2. inpatient psychiatric hospitalization;
  3. residential psychiatric treatment requiring physical presence;
  4. crisis stabilization requiring physical supervision;
  5. emergency detention, involuntary commitment, or custody proceedings requiring physical control, transport, or examination under State law;
  6. laboratory testing, imaging, toxicology testing, vitals collection, or physical examination when physically necessary and not otherwise obtainable;
  7. a service for which federal law expressly requires an in-person encounter;
  8. an individualized clinical determination, documented by the treating provider, that telehealth cannot meet the applicable standard of care for that patient and service; or
  9. a patient’s affirmative request for in-person care when in-person care is available.

D. Coverage Parity

The State shall require every health plan subject to State authority, every Medicaid managed care organization, the State Medicaid program, and every State-funded mental health program to cover a covered outpatient mental health service delivered by telehealth if the same or substantially equivalent service would be covered when delivered in person.

E. Payment Parity

The State shall require reimbursement for covered outpatient mental health services delivered by telehealth at a rate not less than 100 percent of the rate paid for the same or substantially equivalent service when delivered in person.

Payment parity shall apply to:

  1. psychiatric evaluation and management;
  2. psychiatric diagnostic evaluation;
  3. psychotherapy;
  4. counseling;
  5. mental health therapy;
  6. medication management;
  7. family therapy;
  8. group therapy;
  9. behavioral health treatment;
  10. substance use disorder counseling and treatment;
  11. crisis services;
  12. case management;
  13. care coordination;
  14. intensive outpatient services;
  15. partial hospitalization services when clinically appropriate for telehealth delivery;
  16. community mental health center services;
  17. federally qualified health center behavioral health services;
  18. rural health clinic behavioral health services;
  19. bundled payments;
  20. per-diem outpatient program rates;
  21. professional components;
  22. facility or clinic components when payable for comparable in-person care; and
  23. any other covered outpatient mental health service, visit, procedure, or program.

F. Audio-Only Protection

The State shall require coverage and reimbursement of audio-only telehealth for covered outpatient mental health services when clinically appropriate or necessary for access.

Audio-only telehealth shall be protected when:

  1. the patient lacks video technology;
  2. the patient lacks reliable broadband;
  3. the patient cannot use video technology because of disability, symptoms, privacy concerns, device limitations, language access needs, or other access barriers;
  4. the patient does not consent to video communication;
  5. the patient reasonably prefers audio-only communication; or
  6. the treating provider determines that audio-only care is clinically appropriate.

G. No Originating-Site or Geographic Restrictions

The State shall prohibit geographic, rural-area, county-based, distance-based, facility-based, or originating-site restrictions on covered outpatient mental health services delivered by telehealth.

A patient’s home, school, workplace, shelter, community setting, residential setting, correctional setting, or any other safe and private location may serve as the originating site.

H. Provider-Patient Relationship by Telehealth

The State shall allow a provider-patient relationship for outpatient mental health care to be established by telehealth.

A prior in-person relationship shall not be required.

I. Prescribing by Telehealth

The State shall permit prescribing, ordering, and managing medication through telehealth for outpatient mental health treatment to the fullest extent permitted by federal law.

The State shall not impose an in-person requirement for prescribing unless expressly required by federal law or by an individualized clinical determination documented by the treating provider.

J. Patient Choice

The State shall preserve a patient’s right to request telehealth and a patient’s right to request in-person care when in-person care is available.

K. Enforcement

The State shall provide meaningful enforcement mechanisms, including complaint rights, appeal rights, penalties for payer noncompliance, payment of underpaid claims, and protection against retaliation.


Section 6. State Certification

  1. Not later than 18 months after enactment of this Act, each State receiving covered federal mental health payments shall submit to the Secretary a certification stating whether the State has enacted and implemented a TREAT-compliant law.
  2. The certification shall include:

    a. the text of the State law, regulation, or enforceable statewide policy;

    b. an explanation of how the State satisfies each requirement in Section 5;

    c. identification of the State agencies responsible for enforcement;

    d. the State’s process for patient and provider complaints;

    e. the State’s process for health plan enforcement;

    f. the State’s Medicaid tele-mental health coverage and payment policies;

    g. the State’s audio-only telehealth policies;

    h. documentation of stakeholder consultation, including consultation with mental health providers, patients, disability advocates, rural health advocates, Medicaid beneficiaries, and community mental health providers; and

    i. any other information the Secretary determines necessary.

  3. A State shall update its certification annually.
  4. The Secretary shall publish each State certification and compliance determination on a public website.

Section 7. Federal Review and Determination of Compliance

  1. The Secretary shall review each State certification and determine whether the State has enacted and implemented a TREAT-compliant law.
  2. The Secretary shall issue a preliminary determination not later than 120 days after receiving a State certification.
  3. If the Secretary determines that a State is not compliant, the Secretary shall provide written notice identifying each deficiency.
  4. A State shall have 180 days after receiving notice to cure the deficiency.
  5. After the cure period, the Secretary shall issue a final compliance determination.
  6. A State may request administrative reconsideration of a final noncompliance determination in accordance with procedures established by the Secretary.
  7. A State law that substantially adopts the model State TREAT Act shall be deemed compliant unless the Secretary identifies a specific conflict with the requirements of this Act.

Section 8. Ten Percent Withholding for Noncompliant States

  1. Beginning with the first fiscal year that starts at least 24 months after enactment of this Act, if the Secretary determines that a State has failed to enact and implement a TREAT-compliant law, the Secretary shall reduce covered federal mental health payments to that State by 10 percent for that fiscal year.
  2. The 10 percent reduction shall apply only to covered federal mental health payments.
  3. The reduction shall continue for each fiscal year in which the State remains noncompliant.
  4. The Secretary shall restore full covered federal mental health payments beginning with the first fiscal quarter after the Secretary determines that the State has enacted and implemented a TREAT-compliant law.
  5. A reduction under this section shall not be construed to authorize a State, health plan, Medicaid managed care organization, provider, or contractor to reduce, deny, delay, or terminate medically necessary mental health care for any individual.
  6. A State subject to a reduction under this section shall maintain coverage, reimbursement, and access for eligible patients using State funds or other available funds.
  7. A State may not reduce provider reimbursement, narrow eligibility, reduce covered benefits, or impose new patient cost sharing as a means of offsetting a reduction under this section.
  8. A State subject to a reduction shall submit to the Secretary a corrective access plan explaining how the State will prevent harm to patients and providers during the period of noncompliance.

Section 9. Reallotment and Use of Withheld Funds

  1. Amounts withheld under Section 8 shall remain available to the Secretary for grants to compliant States, local governments, Tribal organizations, community mental health centers, federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, school-based mental health programs, and nonprofit providers to expand tele-mental health access.
  2. Priority shall be given to projects that:

    a. expand tele-mental health access in rural areas;

    b. expand access for disabled patients;

    c. expand audio-only access for patients without broadband or video technology;

    d. support community mental health providers;

    e. reduce wait times for outpatient mental health care;

    f. improve access for Medicaid beneficiaries;

    g. expand culturally competent and language-accessible mental health services;

    h. support school-based mental health services;

    i. improve telehealth access for older adults;

    j. improve telehealth access for children and adolescents; or

    k. support technology and workflow improvements for small and safety-net mental health providers.

  3. Withheld funds shall not revert to the Treasury if they can be used to expand tele-mental health access under this section.

Section 10. Maintenance of Effort

  1. A State receiving covered federal mental health payments shall maintain State expenditures for outpatient mental health services, behavioral health services, and substance use disorder services at a level not less than the average level of such expenditures for the two fiscal years preceding the fiscal year for which payment is sought.
  2. A State may not use federal funds made available under this Act to supplant State funds.
  3. The Secretary may waive all or part of the maintenance-of-effort requirement for a fiscal year if the Secretary determines that extraordinary economic conditions in the State justify the waiver and that the waiver will not reduce access to outpatient mental health care.

Section 11. Protection of Individual Benefits

  1. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to reduce an individual’s entitlement to Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or any other federal health benefit.
  2. No individual shall be denied eligibility, coverage, treatment, medication, therapy, counseling, crisis care, or other medically necessary mental health care because a State is subject to a reduction under Section 8.
  3. No provider shall be denied payment for a covered service furnished to an eligible individual solely because a State is subject to a reduction under Section 8.
  4. The Secretary shall enforce this section to ensure that any funding reduction is borne by the noncompliant State and not by patients or providers.

Section 12. Medicaid and CHIP State Plan Requirements

  1. As a condition of receiving covered federal mental health payments under Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, a State plan or waiver shall provide that covered outpatient mental health services may be delivered by telehealth when clinically appropriate.
  2. A State Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program shall not impose in-person requirements for covered outpatient mental health services except as permitted under Section 5(C).
  3. A State Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program shall reimburse covered outpatient mental health services delivered by telehealth at a rate not less than 100 percent of the rate paid for the same or substantially equivalent service delivered in person.
  4. Medicaid managed care organizations and CHIP managed care organizations shall comply with this Act as a condition of contracting with the State.
  5. The Secretary may issue guidance, regulations, State Medicaid Director letters, and model State plan amendment language to implement this section.

Section 13. Private Insurance and ERISA Savings Clause

  1. A State shall apply its TREAT-compliant law to all health plans subject to State regulation.
  2. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit a State’s authority to regulate insurance, health maintenance organizations, Medicaid managed care organizations, public employee health plans, or any other health coverage subject to State law.
  3. This Act applies to self-funded employee benefit plans only to the extent permitted by federal law.
  4. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to reduce or preempt any stronger State law that provides broader telehealth access, stronger payment parity, broader audio-only protection, or greater mental health coverage.

Section 14. Rulemaking

  1. Not later than 180 days after enactment, the Secretary shall issue interim final regulations to implement this Act.
  2. Final regulations shall be issued not later than 1 year after enactment.
  3. Regulations shall include:

    a. model State TREAT Act language;

    b. certification procedures;

    c. compliance review procedures;

    d. public reporting requirements;

    e. withholding procedures;

    f. reallotment procedures;

    g. Medicaid and CHIP implementation guidance;

    h. enforcement procedures;

    i. patient and provider complaint processes; and

    j. standards for determining whether audio-only telehealth is protected.

  4. The Secretary shall consult with:

    a. State mental health authorities;

    b. State Medicaid agencies;

    c. State insurance regulators;

    d. mental health providers;

    e. community mental health centers;

    f. federally qualified health centers;

    g. rural health clinics;

    h. disability rights organizations;

    i. patient advocates;

    j. Tribal health organizations;

    k. youth mental health advocates;

    l. substance use disorder treatment providers; and

    m. privacy and civil rights experts.


Section 15. Annual Reports to Congress

  1. Not later than 2 years after enactment, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit a public report to Congress on implementation of this Act.
  2. The report shall include:

    a. each State’s compliance status;

    b. States subject to withholding;

    c. amounts withheld from each noncompliant State;

    d. amounts reallotted under Section 9;

    e. tele-mental health utilization data;

    f. audio-only telehealth utilization data;

    g. outpatient mental health wait-time data, where available;

    h. Medicaid and CHIP tele-mental health access data;

    i. complaint and enforcement data;

    j. provider network adequacy data;

    k. rural access data;

    l. disability access data;

    m. recommendations for improving tele-mental health access; and

    n. recommendations for additional congressional action.


Section 16. Enforcement

  1. The Secretary may enforce this Act through audits, corrective action plans, payment reductions, grant conditions, Medicaid and CHIP oversight, civil monetary penalties where authorized, and any other remedy available under federal law.
  2. The Secretary may require a State to submit documents, claims data, plan documents, provider manuals, reimbursement schedules, utilization management criteria, Medicaid managed care contracts, and other materials necessary to determine compliance.
  3. A State that knowingly submits a false certification under this Act shall be subject to all remedies available under federal law.
  4. The Secretary shall establish a public complaint process through which patients, providers, advocates, and health plans may report State noncompliance.
  5. The Secretary shall investigate credible complaints and publish aggregate complaint data annually.

Section 17. No Retaliation

  1. A State, health plan, Medicaid managed care organization, provider, contractor, or other entity shall not retaliate against any patient, provider, facility, program, or advocate for asserting rights under this Act.
  2. Prohibited retaliation includes termination, nonrenewal, reduced reimbursement, denial of claims, exclusion from a network, adverse licensing action, adverse credentialing action, harassment, or any other penalty related to asserting rights under this Act.

Section 18. Construction

  1. This Act shall be liberally construed to promote access to outpatient mental health care.
  2. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to:

    a. require telehealth when telehealth would violate the applicable standard of care;

    b. prohibit a patient from requesting in-person care;

    c. prohibit a provider from offering in-person care;

    d. authorize a service prohibited by federal law;

    e. authorize prescribing prohibited by federal law;

    f. reduce privacy protections under federal or State law;

    g. reduce mental health parity protections under federal or State law;

    h. reduce disability rights protections under federal or State law;

    i. reduce Medicaid or CHIP beneficiary protections; or

    j. preempt stronger State telehealth protections.

  3. If another federal or State law provides broader telehealth access, stronger payment parity, broader audio-only protection, or greater mental health access, the more protective provision shall control.

Section 19. Severability

If any provision of this Act, or the application of any provision to any person, entity, State, program, payment, or circumstance, is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect any other provision or application of this Act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.


Section 20. Effective Date

  1. This Act shall take effect on the date of enactment.
  2. State certification requirements shall begin 18 months after enactment.
  3. The 10 percent withholding under Section 8 shall begin with the first fiscal year that starts at least 24 months after enactment.
  4. The Secretary may issue implementation guidance immediately upon enactment.