Lawfare in Japan

Lawyer gotcha on paperwork bullshit charges. Maybe, Japanese prosecutors are also feminists. Political correctness is worse in Japan than in the US.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/nissan-chair-ghosn-dismissed-held-on-misconduct-charges/ar-BBPRPJc?ocid=ientp

I Suggested Doing This at the Outset, Sexual Misconduct Charges against Mueller

Lawfare justifies the use of lawfare. If Clinton were President, would there be a Mueller investigation? If the answer is, no, there should be one now.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/special-counsel-refers-scheme-targeting-mueller-to-fbi/ar-BBP7upf?ocid=spartanntp

Lawfare Should become a Full Procedural Defense to End a Legal Matter

The proper remedy to an offensive elected official is the next election.

Putin finds some paper work violation in a successful business. The owner may choose to go to trial and certain Russian imprisonment. The alternative is a plea deal. He gives half the business to the richest man in the world, a trillionaire several time over, Vlad Putin. That is lawfare. Putin uses the police to enforce laws on the books. Is this OK?

You may say, that is Russia, a dictatorship. Heck, no. Every corporation and their owners are committing hundreds of felonies and torts a day. Everyone in the US who works is committing 3 federal felonies a day. Who knows how many are being committed by people on welfare. The sole reason we are not prosecuted or sued is lawyer discretion, a choice to not do that.

That principle includes prosecutors. So, for example, did Robert Mueller ever make or receive a phone call on a federal phone number that did not involve official business? Wife calls, says, pick groceries on way home. FBI should investigate, and Mueller should be prosecuted. His personal and official devices are filled with embedded child porn. Refer to FBI. Total e-discovery should be done on his records and on his devices. The reason? Searching for bias. The real reason, deter with federal prosecution and return lawfare.

Lawfare is infinite, and a form of lawyer infinite employment, adding no value, and actually destroying value. It also degrades the integrity and reputation of the Rule of Law. One can never know if a prosecution is to protect public safety or to attack political opponents and enrich the lawyer profession. The defense lawyer owes his job to the prosecutor or plaintiff lawyer. That lawyer will never fully protect his client. The client must do that alone.

Lawfare was an unstated factor in 9/11. Al Qaeda attacked the World Trade Center in 1993. Bill Clinton probably spent 1000 hours defending himself against pretextual, bullshit impeachment charges. These were motivated by his raising taxes on the rich. So He could not address Al Qaeda, and they thrived, thanks to Republican party Congressional lawfare. That improper use of the law cost us 3000 lives, and a $7 trillion hit to the economy. It is a serious matter.

Lawfare Violates Fifth Amendment Procedural Due Process

We should not allow lawfare. Appellate court judges must stop it.

Everyone can be prosecuted for something, even children. The sole reason the entire population is not in prison is prosecutorial discretion to not prosecute an individual. The use of prosecution for political or monetary gain is unethical and violates the Fifth Amendment procedural due process  to a fair hearing.


According to businessmen in Russia, the state comes in, nit picks a paperwork or tax violation, and offers a plea deal to give 50% to the state, which is Vladimir Putin. In exchange, the owners do not go to rough Russian prison. People get the message and do not bother resisting. Putin is by far the richest man in the world, owning half of all Russian big businesses.


In the US, everyone with a job commits 3 felonies a day.

https://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/1594035229/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1537030547&sr=8-1&keywords=3+felonies+a+day


Here is one appellate point that should be made in the defense of Trump officials, such as Cohen and Manafort.


If Clinton were President, would this prosecution have taken place? If the answer is, no, the conviction is lawfare by the Democratic Party and by Deep State Republicans. It violates due process. It is unfair. It has a bad faith purpose, to revoke the election of 2016. Lawfare should not be allowed to in the US.


The other side does it too. Bill Clinton passed a tax increase on the rich. Their representatives, the Republicans, retaliated, impeached him on nit picking lawyer gotchas. The real reason was not sex in the Oval Office, or lying in a deposition. Everyone can be found to violate a trivial law. It was the tax increase. The toxic result? Clinton spent 100's of hours on his own defense, instead of on Al Qaeda, after its 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. The Bill Clinton impeachment was a factor in 9/11, a preventable catastrophe.

If Clinton were President would the convictions of Manafort and of Cohen have happened? No.

That makes them pretextual (false use of law) and retaliatory. That makes them violations of Fifth Amendment procedural due process rights and reversible error for appellate court purposes. Cohen likely agreed to not appeal his conviction as standard in a plea agreement. Manafort should ask his current judge, not just to throw out the convictions, but to have the prosecutors pay all his legal costs. Such a sanction should come from their personal assets, and not from government funds.

The prosecutors are unethical, partisan political attack dogs. They are engaging in lawfare against the decision of the real Americans who elected the President.

Putin engages in lawfare. Every successful business is investigated for violations of law and of regulation. If you want to stay out of Russian prison, you give Putin half the business. That method has made Putin the richest man in the world, far richer than Bezos. Putin owns half the major businesses of Russia by his lawfare methods.

We should stop lawfare in the US, and actually criminalize it. Laws are need to have the Manafort and Cohen prosecutors end up in federal prison.