Letter to the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Demanding an End to Restrictions on Prescriptions of Stimulants to Children with ADHD

DEA Diversion Control Division
Attn: Liaison and Policy Section
8701 Morrissette Drive
Springfield, VA 22152

    RE: Prescribing of Stimulants in Children

Dear Madam or Sir,
I am requesting a waiver from your rules and oversight for doctors with child psychiatry training, for pediatricians, and for family doctors prescribing stimulants to children with attention deficit disorder, some with hyperactivity (ADHD), some without it (ADD). These rules include the prohibition of refills, the filling of scripts within days of their date, the limiting of post dated prescriptions to a total of three, oppressive tracking of prescribers, disruptive  harassment of legitimate prescribers.

Your statutory purpose is to reduce addiction in the United States. In the case of children and adolescents on stimulants, the majority must be forced to take them. Most resist doing so to avoid getting slowed down. Untreated ADHD is as silly, goofy, disruptive as any intoxication you care to name. They do not want to come down off this innate “high.”

This resistance to taking stimulants is despite tremendous resulting success, the ending of harassment for impulsive behavior, winning academic and conduct awards, the pressure of their families. The majority also have concomitant oppositional defiant disorder, where they engage in pointless opposition to adult instruction for no advantage to them. It comes as a package with ADHD.

This reaction and their features are the polar opposite of addiction. Your restrictions on these prescribers represent regulatory quackery. They violate the American with Disabilities Act Amendment, now covering mental conditions. They are against good policy by restricting access to care. They are cruel and stupid. Let me know your decision and any analysis by your legal counsel. If you decline this request, I will sue you in federal court for the above violations of law and of policy.

Fire This Judge

This family is just a very hostile family. The judge is indulging their hatred. They are to sue 80 parents who signed a petition opposing this child's denial of reality. This judge is using the power of the state to impose his sciko feelings on an entire community. This sicko judge should be removed by the employer or get driven from the state.

Racism in the US? No.

African immigrants have pitch black skins. They totally rebut all accusations of racism. They did as well as whites in the 2010 Census. They have employers chasing after them because they are great workers. They have American black women chasing after them because they are thin, good looking, moral, and speak the King's English. Real Africans are the new Koreans. Possible explanations? 1) intact patriarchal families; 2) religious faith; 3) love of this country, and no entitled attitude.

Our blacks are not even black. Their DNA is likely to come from the British Isles. Their awful behavior is best explained as stemming from their being white trash, criminals and alcoholics expelled by the Crown to the colonies. If any race whore like the above historian, makes any type of entitled demand, demand a swab of his cheek.

Their most successful example? Barack Obama, offspring of an African. Had zero in common with American South blacks. Fits the above description.

Improving Prosecutions

The Rules of Conduct should add a fiduciary duty to the list of prosecutor special duties. The prosecution and the plea should not be motivated by personal advantage.

Do not spend $2 million prosecuting Martha Stewart on a $40,000 insider trading beef and on lying to the FBI in an informal conversation in her home, in order to get your name in the papers. That prosecutor should have lost his law license.

End all prosecutorial tort immunities, or failing to pass a constitutional amendment, force all prosecutors to waive their immunity if they want to keep their jobs in the executive branch. Tort liability would allow the specialty to police itself through standard of professional due care analyses by the courts. Let them all carry liability insurance as everyone else does.

Prosecutors should also be liable for discretion errors resulting in damage to crime victims, again in accordance to professional standards.

The carelessness of prosecutors fully qualifies for strict liability. But, they are so bad, such a standard would end prosecutions and bankrupt government. They fail to prosecute 95% of serious crime. When they have a guy, 20% of the time they have the wrong guy. That is also true in $million budget, death penalty cases. Worse, they have forced the wrong guy to accept a plea deal. In the case of the $million budget death penalty case, they get the wrong guy to confess to the murder in 25% of exonerated cases. They fed him details of the crime only the murderer would know.

Prosecutors have to be the most failed group of specialists in the entire nation. Maybe, public defenders have a worst record. Those are totally useless.

Texting by Girlfriend and Suicide Case

For 1000 years of jurisprudence, the intentional act of the suicide victim broke the chain of causation of the suicide by any other party. That changed after a ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court in the 1980's.

After suicide, people want to scapegoat others, whether girlfriends on line, or treating doctors. I oppose all suicide tort litigation, and certainly criminal charges. The sole exception is a physician who physically assists a patient to kill himself, in a state where physician assisted suicide is prohibited, handing a person a gun, injecting the person with a poison, pushing them off a roof.

As with other catastrophes, multiple factors operate, and most are not under the control of the defendant. The most powerful is mental illnesses, most of which are familial. The second most powerful factor is intoxication, especially by alcohol. Then comes family relationships. I would have gone after the family as a major factor.

As to the judge's, "...Miss Carter took no actions … She called no one...," I have a Massachusetts byline, not a Vermont byline. To my knowledge, there is no duty to rescue in that state.

So the defendant is being scapegoated for major factors not under her control, in violation of Fifth Amendment procedural due process right to a fair hearing.

In addition, she is being subjected to outcome bias, another violation of her due process right.  The failure to raise this argument should be lawyer malpractice because it is ubiquitous.

I am not going to invent a duty. However, here is a potential one.

In the greatest achievement in psychiatry of the 20th Century that no one knows about, not even psychiatrists, the prisons of the United States dropped their suicide rate by 80%, at no expense, with no new staffing, no programs, no treatment. It was not done by psychiatrists, but by prison wardens. Eyesight supervision. Period.

This victim tried to off himself several times. His brain was not working right. His family had a duty to maintain eyesight supervision. Instead he was alone. He drove a truck. he found access to an engine. This is a ridiculous fuck up by the family. His psychiatrists should have informed them of this sole tactic to prevent suicide. His psychiatrist should have placed him on a major tranquilizer for his false belief that death would solve his problems. Once his depression had been more adequately treated, more aggressively treated, there is a 100% chance, with no known exception in history, that he would be glad he had not killed himself.

So the multi-factorial analysis to catastrophes applies to suicide as well.

Imagine dropping the national suicide number of 35000 people by 80% at no additional cost. Stop the bullshit of hotline, and talking. Stop the stupid hand wringing by toxic left wing assholes.

I do not want to diverge here into the aggressive and proper management of suicide, except to say, the wardens of the prisons of the United States discovered it, and it costs nothing. It should be a standard of due care for professionals and for the families of the suicidal.

Message to Medical Legal Committee of County Medical Society

1) There is not a shortage of doctors. There is an intentional shortage of doctor time consumed by insurance procedure in the greatest scam in history worth $trillion, to prevent doctors from seeing more patients. Organized medicine is doing nothing about it. The legal concept is undue burden on people with disabilities.


2) Prepayment should be declared unethical. When I refer patients to PCP's, they are rudely treated and denied basic care. If the patients say, I am not coming back, the doctors are glad. That implies that more visits cost money rather than make money. Professionalism cannot withstand the need to survive on very low pre-payments. The incentive in prepayment is to deny care, not to provide care. This results in massive denial of care to very sick people.


3) Disparate impact is now evidence of racial discrimination, according to a Supreme Court housing case. Medicaid tactics impact minorities disproportionately. Therefore, denial of care should now be considered racial discrimination.

Two opposing Harvard Law grads agree. They should have final say in government rule of law.

Here are some problems with this nice agreement between a conservative Justice and a liberal Justice.

1) Lawyers are the stupidest group of people in the country. Any native intelligence they start with is beaten out of them by the cult indoctrination they undergo to join the profession. They have supernatural beliefs, and their methods were developed in the 13th Century, by monks. They are carrying out the business model of the Inquisition, down to every detail;

2) Among lawyers, Harvard Law grads are absolutely the stupidest of all;

3) They are so stupid, they think they are the smartest people in our country. They feel they can set policy for highly technical and complicated subject from shipping to health;

4) For example, they did not read the very plain English of Article I Section 1 of the constitution. It gives law making power to the Congress; it therefore prohibits judicial review, which is the cancellation of laws by unaccountable courts, staffed by the very stupidest people in our country;

5) These two are so stupid, they failed to notice, they have no way to enforce any decision they make. Federal marshals are employees of the Executive branch. Therefore the Executive may choose to enforce or to not enforce their decisions. The Executive will act only in its own selfish political interest;

6) As a result of this stupendous stupidity, government does nothing right. They did not see, it is detested by everyone except tax sucking parasites receiving a government check, usually returning absolutely nothing of value to the tax payer.

What can be done about how stupid these Harvard Law grads are?

1) The Congress should impeach one, then another for their decisions, not for any collateral corruption lawyer gotcha.

Replace them all with members of a local Virginia jury pool, or even with student from Life Skills Class learning to eat with a spoon. There would be an immediate upgrade in the quality of the decisions, and in the clarity of the writing of the decisions;

2) The Executive should openly declare which decisions it will never enforce, making all their decisions advisory, and no longer mandatory;

3) States are the father, the federal government is the child. When the stupidest people in the country make a ruling, ignore it. Do as you please, the child has to obey the parent, not the reverse. If federal marshals do show up to enforce these appallingly bad decisions, taser them and expel them from the state. If troops show up, tell they are in insurrection against the constitution, Article I Section 1. If they persist, arrest them, try them, and execute them. They are in insurrection against the constitution.

Hey, Harvard morons, if you want to have judicial review, pass an amendment to the constitution. Today, it is not allowed.

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/national-constitution-center-president-rosen-interviews-breyer-gorsuch

Reminder.

People complain about endless war, and it has only been a couple of decades.

The US war against the indigenous people lasted from 1682 to 1920. War will last as long as necessary.

Mens Rea is Not Just Lawyer Quackery. It is Illegal. So is Any Other Use of a Latin Word in a Legal Utterance

I am not reading this article.

Mens Rea. Latin. Language of the Catholic Church is not allowed by our constitution in the legal system. Latin endorses Catholicism.

Copied from the Catechism. Section 1857. Not allowed.

To its credit the Medieval Church believed God would judge intent upon reaching heaven, His being all knowing. That was their faith, they said. Not even the 13th Century Church believed man could read minds.

Mind reading is a supernatural power.

In the 13th Century, the sole punishment was death. So loopholes were needed to soften the law. That is no longer necessary.

Retribution and culpability are from the Bible. They are worthless to the tax payer. They are prohibited, except in the imaginary world of the lawyer.

Mens rea is more lawyer false doctrine, coddling the criminal, and harsh treatment of past and future victims.

Mens rea is anti-victim garbage. If someone reads the article, explain why anyone would bother doing so, outside the anti-victim, left wing, pro-criminal lawyer.

A hunter shoots another thinking him a deer. A hunter shoots another because the other's wife paid him $10,000. Same act. Same outcome. Vastly different treatment of the defendant. One goes home, the other gets the death penalty, all based on the mental state. This is ridiculous. How does the lawyer know the drunken hunter who killed a guy is not far more dangerous than the contract killer with discipline? The lawyer has loosed a menace on the public and executed a far less dangerous guy. The drunken hunter is now loosed by the lawyer to crash into a school bus.

The alternative to the mens rea is far more reliable, fairer, and safer to the public. Count unconvicted conduct and prior convicted conduct. And incapacitate for the status of the person, not for the crime. Naturally, the lawyer has banned strict liability crime, and compounded the mistake by banning status crime. Why would logic be banned by the lawyer, and coddling of the criminal be imposed on crime victims? Because the lawyer makes no money if the criminal is incapacitated for being a criminal from the earliest age possible, and crime is suppressed. Give the data to the jury if Booker must be followed, even though the jury does not know anything about this technical subject.
Lawyers should stop saying crime has dropped in rates. It has not. Saying it has destroys the credibility of any lawyer.

If any law school professor uses any Latin in class, the Jewish and Protestant students should start banging Mao's Little Red Book on their chair writing tablets. If he does it again, he should be grabbed. A tall dunce cap should be placed on his head, and he should be bounced from the class. This is America, a secular nation.

Complaints may be filed with the Civil Rights Office of the Education Department, for the violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Imagine a professor seeking to impose the Sharia on our students. Seeking to impose the Catechism is no less offensive. Every single Latin utterance should be reported, investigated, and fined heavily. There is ongoing, massive violation of this law in our law schools. I support the right to speak Latin by the professor in church, at home, or anywhere else, but not in law school class, nor in any other legal setting.

May the Lawyers Ordering the Taking Down of Confederate Statues Ever Criticize Taliban and ISIS Savagery for Destroying Historic Landmark Statues of Other Faiths?

No.

A good reason to polygraph all sex accusers

False accusers in Israel are legally immune.

This policy justifies the removal of the Israeli equivalent of Jeff Sessions, based on his prosecutorial immunity.

I have proposed the penalty for false statement to government officials by lying feminists be the maximum, 2 years of prison for a  second degree misdemeanor. All false accusers of President Trump should be prosecuted and receive that maximum.

Feminist groups suborning false allegations should be sued by the victims of the false accusations. The responsible officials of such feminist groups should not be able to hide behind any corporate veil.

In Italy, the false allegation got a feminist 12 years.

Back to the Israeli immunity granted to feminist false accusers.  The above documentary made Israeli women unmarriageable, and unemployable. 

Israeli men should convert to Islam, which still respects the patriarchal family.

Should the Use of Falsies or of Make up to Cover Acne be Criminalized?

Man pleads guilty. He promised women money and a chance at making porn films. He had sex with them to sample.

Oxytocin and Naltrexone for Autism Social Impairment

Fancy theory, but the control should a benzodiazepine, such as Xanax, since naltrexone sedates and relaxes people. Is this is a non-specific sedative effect? I never see a sedative comparison group. 

May 09, 2017

Combination approach may help combat autism

Yale School of Medicine News

The hormone oxytocin, the so–called hug hormone or cuddle chemical, has more nicknames than proven medical uses. However, oxytocin may benefit children with autism spectrum disorders if receptors for opioids – brain chemicals activated by drugs such as heroin that tend to disconnect people socially – are also blocked, Yale researchers reported the week of May 1 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Oxytocin plays a key role in sealing social bonds during activities such as sex and nursing, but its use in spurring greater social connections among people with autism has had limited success. However, Yale researchers were able to significantly increase social interaction among monkeys – as measured by extent of eye contact – when oxytocin delivery was paired with the drug naloxone, which blocks opioid receptors and is widely used to combat heroin overdoses.

It has long been noted that use of the opioid morphine disrupts lactation in nursing mothers, but naloxone reverses those symptoms in part by spurring increased production of oxytocin. The authors suggest the two neurochemical systems appear to be evolutionarily linked in human behavior: oxytocin spurring creation of strong social bonds and opioids — as tragically illustrated in cases of addiction — triggering greater social isolation.

Coupling an increase in oxytocin and the inhibition of opioid receptors “really boosts social interactions in a robust way we do not see when using either approach individually,” said Steve Chang, assistant professor of psychology and neurobiology and senior author of the paper.

Yale’s Olga Dal Monte and Matthew Piva are co–lead authors of the study. Chang’s team also collaborated with Yale’s Kevin Anderson and Avram Holmes to obtain gene expression evidence supporting the observed social boost in the human brain.

Threat to Privacy is Getting Ubiquitous

The opening screen on my Nissan Rogue states that data on the car will be transmitted to Nissan. I wrote asking what data, who gets its, how it will be used. I asked if it is available to government officials. They replied that a black box has been in Nissans since 2006. Car functions are being monitored, and that, yes, the data would be available to government entities when appropriate. They did not say they would need a court order to reveal the content.I am now asking, how to turn it off, and how to disconnect the black box recorder.

So, Nissan knows everything about my use of the car. The police can prove I was speeding. The wife can prove I was at my mistress's address on a specific date. (Just kidding, Honey. I could not handle two bosses.)

It gets worse. My son in law was discussing a product in his living room, with all appliances off. He then began receiving ads on this product. The likely source of his privacy breach was the microphone of his turned off smart TV, or his cellphone running Android, or his X-Box. It is waiting for instructions to turn on, for example. However, while waiting, it might be transmitting the conversation in the living room to Google.

Wifi holograms of objects behind walls are now possible.

Police Allow Masked Commies to Burn the Newspaper Boxes of Poor People Trying to Make a Meager Living

Here.

Letter to School District About Student Driven Learning Quackery

I received your report. Stop your New Age nonsense. All of it is gibberish to falsely justify increases in taxes.

You stink. Your schools stink by any objective measure. Your students stink, and are total, disgraceful, under-performers, compared to less privileged children in other systems. That utter failure is 100% your fault. You spend an unbelievable $27000 per student, yearly, and we are getting inferior students back.

Stop wasting money on defective, special education students, who will never amount to anything. Stop overpaying teachers. Start to increase your class size. Make people learn instead of your bullshit, disproved, feel good, crap methodology, such as student driven learning. You are trying to make to make students do the teacher’s job. Students don’t know anything. If students drive education, they will end up still not knowing anything. You are a quack. There is only one way to learn, and that is through repetition. If a student is stupid in a subject, that means they must repeat the learning more times. But, everyone gets to learn the basics. Nations emphasizing such learning are beating the pants off American students. American students stink because of educational quacks like you. You need to leave this school district. Peddle your quackery in California, where no one cares about performance, but only about making students feel good.

I want to stop your educational quackery in court. I am going to start this legal process by demanding an investigation into your quackery by the state. Did you like my use of commas? I learned it in the slum schools of New York, at the cost of $100's a year, per pupil. I was taught how to use the comma, and made to practice.

Baltimore Mayor Asks FBI to Help with Out of Control Murders. Here

My lawyer friends may be puzzled by this request, since murders are state crimes, and not federal crimes. However, I see another angle.

This lady had her police officers falsely prosecuted. As a result, the police has decided to just respond to 911 calls. They are basically, on strike. This effect is called the Ferguson Effect. Since the FBI investigated, and harassed this police and many other police departments, they are responsible for the rise in murders. The murder rate does correlate with the solution rate by the police. This effect may also apply to all crimes. The solution rate of murder in Baltimore is a bit over half what it is across the nation.

If the FBI wants to lower crime and murder, it can tear up the Consent Decrees it bullied many police departments into signing.

Taxing Internet Activity

Immunity is stealthy industrial policy to grow  an industry, especially when new. Liability is the reverse, to rein in an industry. That puts industrial policy in the hands of people who do not know anything about anything, lawyers. That is wrong.

That being said, the Internet is mature and wealthy. It no longer needs any immunity.

Austria is seeking to tax internet activity. If we have to have taxes, then immunizing wealthy internet companies and taxing struggling brick and mortar businesses is wrong.

Prison Work Report

 Many times, I have proposed make Prison Industries an aggressive, and lucrative business. Then pay prisoners the market wage of their skills. Deduct from it in this order or sequence, 1) cost of prison; 2) cost of legal procedure; 3) cost of damage to crime victims; 4) cost to tax payer; 5) improving prison conditions.

There is much synthetic chemistry talent in prison. Start a generic drug business, including supplying death penalty drugs. There is much hacking talent. Start a computer security consulting, and problem solving business. There is much knowledge of outside criminal activity. Start a police education business. There is much agricultural talent in prison. Start a legal marijuana growing business. Marijuana generates more profit than all other crops in the US combined.

Structured activity, including massive overtime to generate income for everyone, will markedly reduce conflict and injuries in prion.

While most inmates are unfit for outside jobs, they may do well with the limit setting of prison and prison staff. Infractions should be punished by getting fired from the jobs. These will be seen as great privileges reserved for model prisoners.

If people are frustrated by not qualifying for real prison labor, offer opportunities for more education. If one cannot control ones moods and behaviors, to fit into a job situation, ask for treatment to control these.

Civil Forfeiture to Solve the Monopoly of Facebook/Google/Twitter/Microsoft

Facebook/Google/Twitter/Microsoft has been a factor, a venue for many crimes.

In civil forfeiture, a grandma objects, she has done nothing wrong. The police is now seizing her house. They reply, we are not saying you have broken any law. However, your grandson conducted drug deals in this house, so this house is involved in criminal activity, may be seized.

A guy is pointed out by a drug dog. He say, he has done nothing wrong. The police is seizing his cash. The police says, we are not saying you have broken any law. However, your cash has traces of cocaine, so your cash has been involved in cocaine trafficking.  (All cash in America has traces of cocaine.)

Mark Zuckerberg will say, I have committed no crime. The Department of Justice  says, we are not saying your committed any crime. However, Facebook has been involved in thousands of terrorist and criminal acts. We are therefore seizing the assets of Facebook/Google/Twitter/Microsoft because of its involvement.

Civil forfeiture is the path to stop this abomination, Facebook/Google/Twitter/Microsoft. Seize all of its assets.

Because they meet the legal definition of a monopoly, the government, as possessor, could split them apart, The government executive branch could save delay, drama, and legal cost.

Add Craig's List to the list.

Sextortion at Facebook.