Tuesday, December 20, 2016

It was dogma that there was no addiction before puberty. Not so for video addiction.

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

The Adversarial Legal System

The adversarial system originated in the disputation methodology of a church based philosophy. It was a method to arrive at some truth or conclusion on difficult questions.

1) It violates the Establishment Clause because of its religious origin;

2) it is an atavistic and ridiculous 13th Century method;

3) it has no external validation as a proper method; it does not even have established rates of inter-rater reliability nor test-retest reliability; these do not establish validity, but are necessary before testing validation;

4) it puts the verdict in the hands of fresh grads from law school, who know very little, and excludes the brightest and most experienced person in the court from participating in verdict finding, the judge;

5) empirically, it results in both unacceptably elevated rates of false positives and false negatives, contributing to our sky high crime rates;

6) it is expensive and turns a trial into a theater production, mostly to generate lawyer fees for worthless services, defrauding the tax payer;

7) it brings opprobrium on the lawyer profession, their looking like argumentative jackasses;

8) its stentorian tones, its location in a room that resembles a church, alienates the process from its owners, the tax payer, stupid people putting on a stupid show (bring back wigs);

9) it is probably irrelevant to the jury, as likely to decide a verdict on the likability of a chesty female lawyer as on the complicated facts;

10) it adds further delay in the legal system filled with lazy, do nothing, big government worthless tax sucking parasites, moving the cases ever so slowly.

Lawless, outdated, worthless, lawyer quackery, expensive, stealing of tax money. The adversarial system just sucks and should be scrapped entirely.

Inquisitorial judges, trained as judges, not as lawyers, should lead the investigation,  with judge values, not lawyer values. They should be liable for their mistakes in professional tort liability, and judged according to professional standards of due care. The lazy and slow should be fired.

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Path to First Amendment Enforcement in Private Entities

You own a home. The deed has the boundary line in the middle of the street, and certainly includes the sidewalk in front of the house. If you do not shovel the snow from that sidewalk, you may be fined by the city. It is considered your property.

The sidewalk is your property. It is a public accommodation. Can you exclude people in protected classes from your sidewalk? No. If protesters with a viewpoint want to set up a picket line, in the correct time and manner, may you exclude them based on their viewpoint? No.

Facebook is a private corporation to whom the First Amendment does not apply. However, it is not the dining room of the property. It is the sidewalk. It may not exclude people, or ban, or punish people based on viewpoint. It is the ultimate public accommodation, the ultimate sidewalk portion of the property, with 1.5 billion invitees.

I support an aggregate claim against Facebook, and compensation of $10 Billion to those who have been banned based on viewpoint.

To my Gay Friends, Run. It's a Trap. Gay Marriage.

A non-religious objection to gay marriage is that it elevates friendship to the legally privileged status of marriage. That is an attack by government on the authority of the family. Gay marriage degrades the legal status of marriage, which has the sole purpose of procreation. It makes it the same as a union between any two casual friends.

The family is 10 times more effective at imparting moral behavior on its members, including adults, than government is. So the family is under attack by the lawyer profession and must be crushed. Gay marriage is only one front. There are 10 other fronts of attack.

The bastardy rate among blacks is at 70%, and marriage is dead in that group. Among whites, in the 2010 Census, it soared to a shocking and devastating 40%. There are no significant genetic differences between the races. All disparities in social pathologies are explained by the bastardy rate. Darker skin blacks from Africa, with their traditional family values, and opposing gay marriage, outperformed whites in that same Census.

Gay marriage advocates must be held accountable for the degradation of the white family, and its catastrophic consequences to the country. They have no conscience. They care only about their selfish, left wing, big government, rent seeking interests. They are not even gay advocates. They are shills for the lawyer profession, seeking to generate more work for divorce lawyers. They want to degrade the family, and to promote greater government dependency as is the case among non-immigrant blacks. They are left wing ideologues, big government advocates, not real gay advocates.

Gay marriage was a lawyer idea, not a gay idea. The members of this left wing and naive group do not know that. Because of the collapse of marriage among heterosexuals, the family law business was reeling. They came up with this idea, to plunder the assets of highly productive and well to do gays. Gays have markedly above average incomes, and must be targeted by the lawyer profession.

Being gay does not make one stupid. Complying with left wing cultural fashion trends makes one stupid. In jurisdictions with long standing gay marriage laws, very few gays are falling for that lawyer set trap. For example, in France, only a few thousand gays a year are stupid enough to get married.

In Pennsylvania, the wealthier spouse must pay the legal fees of the poorer one in a divorce. In Pennsylvania, change a diaper on kid, you are considered the parent because of care, not because of genetics. DNA testing on the Maury Show has no effect on being declared a parent, only providing care. The court takes the viewpoint of the child, "I love you, Mommy." Change a diaper, you are on the hook for child raising expenses to college graduation, or $250,000. You numskulls supporting gay marriage, and actually getting married, will be paying the fees of the lawyer destroying your family and your life. You will be paying the child raising cost of a child that is not yours, that you do not see, and that you may not even like, it's being a little entitled brat.

The rate of divorce is the same as that of heterosexual couples. Advocates who claim it is lower are making a simple arithmetic error.

Run, it's a lawyer set trap.